Clayton Armstrong 2011-02-22 GSK Aranda SP - steam&condensat
STEAM AND CONDENSATE AUDIT
Project N°30275
Date: 04/02/2011
GSK MANUFACTURING Aranda, Spain
Page 17 of 45
Established by E. Morin
To the attention of Ms. Beatriz Herrero-Gonzalo
CO2 produced
t/yr
55
Water savings
Existing
Flash steam flow estimated
kg/h
0,066
safety factor
10%
Yearly water lost
m³/year
371
Water unit costs
€/m3
5,0
Water costs
€/yr
1853
In conclusion, we estimate the total potential savings at 9360 €/year .
1. Solution 1 : reduce excess feed water rate on the pump
Considering your installation, the Clayton specialist technician will decide how much it is possible to
reduce the amount of excess water pumped.
The following table shows savings calculation if the rate is decreased by 10% :
Fuel savings
Existing
Proposed
Savings
Feewater flow
m³/hr
1,1
1,1
Excess feedwater rate
%
40%
30%
10%
Excess water flow / condensate
m³/hr
0,44
0,33
0,11
% of revaporisation (7 to 0 barg)
13,5%
13,5%
Flash steam flow estimated
ton/h
0,059
0,045
0,015
Energy loss
kW
37
28
9
operating hours
hr
6240
6240
yearly Energy used
MWh/year
232
174
58
boiler efficiency
%
86
86
Fuel used
MWh/year hhv
300
225
75
Fuel unit costs
€/MWh hhv
25
25
Fuel costs
€/year
7506
5629
1876
CO2 savings
Existing
Proposed
Savings
Energy used
Gj/yr
1081
811
270
CO2 emissions
kg CO2/GJ
50,6
50,6
CO2 produced
t/yr
55
41
14
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software