2000 Hook-up Book
Testing Steam Traps
Table 16: Steam Trap Discharge Modes Mode of Operation
SYSTEM DESIGN
Full or
Usual
Trap Type
No Load
Light Load
Normal Load
Overload
Failure Mode
Float &
Usually continuous but may
Closed,
Thermosatic
No Action
cycle at high pressure
Continuous Continuous
A.V. Open
Inverted Bucket
Small Dribble
Intermittent
Intermittent
Open
Balanced Pressure Thermostatic
No Action
May Dribble
Intermittent May blast at high pressures
Continuous
Variable
Bimetallic
Usually Dribble
Thermostatic
No Action
Action
Continuous
Open
Usually continuous with blast at high loads
Impulse
Small Dribble
Continuous
Open
Disc Thermo-Dynamic
No Action
Intermittent
Intermittent
Continuous
Open
What must be done, using all audible and visual clues, is to detect normal or abnormal cycling of the discharge. Even this method is very fallible, since the mode of operation of different trap types if not nearly so well defined as is sometimes thought. Table 16 lists some of the possi bilities and allows the problem to be seen more clearly. It is seen that the “signal” to be obtained from the trap, whether visual, audio or temperature, is usually going to be so ambiguous as to rely largely on optimism for interpretation. The one trap which is fairly positive in its action is the disc thermodynamic type—if this is heard or seen to cycle up to ten times per minute, it is operating normally. The cycling rate increas es when the trap becomes worn and the characteristic “machine gun” sound clearly indicates the need for remedial action. Spira-tec Leak Detector System Logic says that if it is not possible to have a universally applicable method of checking steam traps by examining the traps them selves, then we must see if it can be done by checking elsewhere. This is what Spirax Sarco has done with the Spira-tec system. See Fig. 61 (page 58). The Spira-tec detector cham ber is fitted into the condensate
line on the inlet side of the trap. If there is, at this point, a normal flow of condensate towards the trap, together with a small amount of air and the steam needed to make up heat loss from the body of the steam trap, then all is normal. On the other hand, an increased flow of gas along the pipe indicates that the trap is leaking. The chamber contains an inverted weir. Condensate flows under this weir and a small hole at the top equalizes the pressure on each side when the steam trap is working normally. An electrode on the upstream side of the baffle detects the presence of conden sate by its conductivity which is much higher than that of steam. By plugging in the portable indi cator, it is possible to check if the electrical circuit is complete when a visual signal indicates that the trap is working. If the trap begins to leak steam, then the pressure on the downstream side of the weir begins to fall. The higher pres sure on the upstream side drops the condensate level below the electrode and exposes it to steam. The “conductivity” circuit is broken and the indicator light gives a “fail” signal. The advantage of the system lies in the very positive signal which does not require experi ence of personal judgement before it can be interpreted.
Using suitable wiring, the test point can be located remote from the sensor chamber or it can have a multi switch to allow up to twelve (12) chambers to be checked from a single test loca tion. When appropriate, an electronic continuous 16-way checking instrument can monitor the chambers and this is readily connected into a central Energy Management System. The object of detecting leak ing steam traps is to correct the problem. This can mean replace ment of the whole trap, or perhaps of the faulty part of the internal mechanism. It is very useful indeed to be able to check a repaired trap in the workshop before it is installed in the line, and many repair shops now use a Spira-tec chamber as part of a bench test rig. The diagram shows a simple hookup which allows suspect or repaired traps to be positively checked. (Fig. 60) Cost Of Steam Leaks The installation and use of the Spira-tec units does involve some cost, and it is necessary to com pare this with the cost of steam leakages to see if the expenditure is economically justifiable. Since all equipment must wear and eventually fail, we need first an estimate of the average life of a steam trap. Let us assume that in a particular installation, this is,
56
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease